|
Post by Psamathe on Apr 20, 2023 10:42:28 GMT
An interesting report/idea from a University of Sheffiled study
Ian
|
|
|
Post by Tringa on Apr 20, 2023 14:22:39 GMT
Yes an interesting idea.
It reminds me of something I read on another forum a few years(probably close to ten) ago.
It was from a member in San Diego. California was, and I think still is, suffering from an increasing demand for and lack of water and his local council offered a reduction in the council tax if residents would convert their gardens to essentially a desert ones - replacing lawns and water requiring plants and shrubs, with gravel and xerophytic plants. I think there was also an element of the council being able to measure the individual water use and would investigate if an unusually high usage was found.
He said he was more than happy to do it as it helped the demand for water, reduced his costs a bit, and gave him an interest in plants he otherwise would not have considered.
Seems like a good idea to me.
Dave
|
|
|
Post by Psamathe on Apr 20, 2023 15:19:52 GMT
Yes an interesting idea. It reminds me of something I read on another forum a few years(probably close to ten) ago. It was from a member in San Diego. California was, and I think still is, suffering from an increasing demand for and lack of water and his local council offered a reduction in the council tax if residents would convert their gardens to essentially a desert ones - replacing lawns and water requiring plants and shrubs, with gravel and xerophytic plants. I think there was also an element of the council being able to measure the individual water use and would investigate if an unusually high usage was found. He said he was more than happy to do it as it helped the demand for water, reduced his costs a bit, and gave him an interest in plants he otherwise would not have considered. Seems like a good idea to me. Dave With these things I often wonder about how effective the actual direct measure is vs the changes in attitude they can cause. Same with e.g. solar panels (which I'm not criticising in any way) but these sorts of measures families can look daily at how much they save, how much they pass on to the grid, watch the credits from their low water garden and in addition to saving water or generating electricity it keeps the issue in the forefront of many people's minds - in effect they are continually being "self-reminded" that e.g. water is a limited resource or that electricity is expensive and still not as renewable as we'd like, etc. Sort of double benefit, direct from the direct action and indirect from the continual indirect self-reminders. Also children get made very aware of the issues and that there is a responsible way to helping. etc. (badly explained but hopefully got the idea across!) Ian
|
|
|
Post by ianr on Apr 21, 2023 6:01:11 GMT
Who pays for such waste of time studies? I get what their saying and even agree that too many gardens are paved and covered with plastic grass but a council tax rebate not a chance in hell. What about the drought there already talking of this year and so early on. Let alone promoting more watering of gardens. Sometimes I wonder if these universities have nothing better to do than to come up with half ***** ideas that are dead in the water "pun intended" before they get started. ian
|
|