|
Post by ianr on Nov 9, 2018 12:14:52 GMT
I've never been a real birder, not the dash around the country for a tick or sit in a hide for hours on end type but over the last year or two I've had an incline to try a spot of digiscoping. With the wonder of the web it's easy to go window shopping and create a wish list Well I'm not going to spend that kinda money just to scratch an itch, far to tight for that I'm thinking I'll just keep an eye out see what comes along and last week on ebay I noticed a vintage scope 15x45 by 60 bushnell spacemaster possibly 70s maybe earlier. I use bushnell binoculars there good and Vintage jap glass should be fine So 42 quid later I'm now the proud owner of a scope it looks as though it's spent all it's life in the box the glass and internals are clean and bright the controls smooth, not a mark on it, naturally the glass won't be multi coated and the eye piece could be bigger with better eye relief. I'll get used to that now I'm going to hunt down a fixed magnification wider angle eye piece 'any ideas 25x or 35x ??' and some way of screwing my camera to it the eye piece being is only 35mm dia might be awkward it'll be doable I'm sure time will tell. Took it to Besthorpe today ian
|
|
|
Post by accipiter on Nov 9, 2018 15:52:27 GMT
Horses for courses Ian, but I must have tried every permutation on planet earth finishing up using binoculars in the end plus my Kodak 65 x bridge AZ 652 camera for pure practicality (less weight to carry) plus my scopes lay in the wardrobe all of the time such is their use. Of course bridge cameras will not give the same result as a more expensive set up as much depends on the quietly of the lens being used but unfortunately inexpensive lightweight telephoto lenses and D S L R cameras do not exist, or if they do I have yet to see one. www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5lBiJoCkJs
|
|
|
Post by Tringa on Nov 11, 2018 13:03:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ianr on Nov 12, 2018 9:13:28 GMT
I agree with you Alan that quality glass is both heavy and expensive even second hand. I think you can get decent dslr/slt camera for a fair price if you don't have to have all the bells and whistles and the latest incarnation. Thanks Dave I'll check them out although what I've seen so far doesn't seem to completely seal the camera internals from the elements and I'll not be hanging my sensor out of a windy hide window more research required there are other methods out there. So from the comfort of my desk I've tried using the wife's little point and shoot my camera with lens on and phone all hand held and managed some good shots of the brick wall over the road the phone being the brightest I've found a phone holder that's fully adjustable and mentioned it to santa 'aka the daughter' ian
|
|
|
Post by accipiter on Nov 12, 2018 14:36:32 GMT
I made my own fitting to hold this camera Ian, but my wife now uses this particular camera while I use the bridge camera mentioned. But I found digiscoping did not really meet my requirements as I found it pretty useless for my particular use e.g. moving subjects on and around nesting sites in fairly dark situations e.g inside woodland, plus the fact one has to keep refocusing on the moving subject. But I will say this particular pocket size camera gives “very good results” on a scope for stationary subjects and normal use. www.trustedreviews.com/reviews/pentax-optio-w10
|
|